↓ Skip to Main Content

Secondary Navigation

Sustainability in Practice

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Planet Earth
  • Three to two planet living
    • How to reduce your environmental footprint
    • – Travel
    • – Creative community
    • – Carbon footprint calculator
    • – Domestic batteries
    • – Family
    • – Finance
    • – Food and packaging
    • – Garden
    • – Home Energy
    • – Household waste
    • – Home office
    • – Porous driveways
  • Two to one planet living
    • Reducing the UK’s environmental footprint
    • – Circular Economy
    • – Commerce, Farming, Fishing, Forestry
    • – CO2 emissions
    • – Corporate social responsibility
    • – Electricity Grid
    • – Household waste overview
    • – Population
    • – Sentinel agencies
    • – Transport
    • – UK energy use and generation
  • Posts
  • About
    • About this site
    • Bibliography
  • Contact us
    • Get in touch
    • Join our mailing list
    • Prospective contributors

Getting our traditional granite houses to zero carbon by 2045

Bob Posted on April 26, 2022 Posted in Energy efficiency, Post on Facebook, Sustainable economy Tagged with Insulation of house

Come to our discussion on insulation, draught-proofing, and zero carbon heating of traditional granite houses, to be held on Tuesday 3rd May, 7-9 pm, via Zoom. Go to Eventbrite, Aberdeen Climate Action events.

Post navigation

Previous Post is ‹ Clarification required regarding compostable plastics.
Next Post is Green Lairds – Land Acquisition for Carbon. ›

Recent Posts

  • Pavement charging hookup for electric vehicles
  • Biodegradable plastic film for sustainable disposal
  • Review of book “More is less” by Jason Hickel
  • Green Lairds – Land Acquisition for Carbon.
  • Getting our traditional granite houses to zero carbon by 2045

Find us on Facebook

Sustainability in Practice

2 years ago

Sustainability in Practice
Less is more by Prof Jason HickelPreventing climate change while promoting a growth economy with a growing population is incompatible. This is the substance of economic anthropologist Prof. Jason Hickel’s absorbing book. For 300,000 years our ancestors worked with nature, taking only what they required. Items were traded, but this was not a capitalist society. More recently, during the last five centuries, the concept of capital started to feature. Land and businesses were acquired by a section of the community, forcing the rest to labour for this elite. Entrepreneurs could borrow money to speed development of their ideas, but the lenders or “shareholders”, became the first in the queue to be rewarded from the wealth created. Pay them too little, and they would lend to others rather than you. Suppliers of labour were well down the list of beneficiaries from the growing economy. The lower the cost of labour, the quicker wealth could accumulate. Slavery, colonisation, mechanisation, automation, unemployment all kept labour costs low. Growing profit rather than just the payment of labour and some reinvestment costs became the aim. The availability of capital enabled companies to become juggernauts or monsters, which could gobble up other companies, in part to prevent they themselves from being gobbled up in turn. In this process, it is not just labour that is exploited but the planet too. Relentless growth is accompanied by mining, construction, destruction of nature and pollution. As Hickel says, “clean energy might help deal with emissions, but it does nothing to reverse deforestation, overfishing, soil depletion, and mass extinction. A growth-obsessed economy powered by clean energy will still tip us into ecological disaster”. “What is required is “degrowth” – a planned reduction of excess energy and resource use to bring the economy back into balance with the living world in a safe just and equitable way”. With the technology and scientific understanding that we now have, we can move to a degrowth society “while at the same time ending poverty, improving human wellbeing, and ensuring good lives for all”.We liberate people from the toil of unnecessary products, and shorten the working week to maintain full employment, and expand access to key public services like universal healthcare education and housing. To preserve the planet, nine potentially destabilising processes must be kept under control; climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean acidification, land-use change, nitrogen and phosphorous loading, freshwater use, atmospheric aerosol loading, chemical pollution and ozone depletion. A capitalist growth economy always wants to take more; more resources, more labour, more energy, producing “stuff “, we neither realise we want or need. Degrowth transitions our efforts into things that we do need, a cooler climate, more biodiversity, healthcare, social equality, and less disparity in income. Truly, “Less is More”. Less is more by Prof Jason HickelPreventing climate change while promoting a growth economy with a growing population is incompatible. This is the substance of economic anthropologist Prof. Jason Hickel’s absorbing book. For 300,000 years our ancestors worked with nature, taking only what they required. Items were traded, but this was not a capitalist society. More recently, during the last five centuries, the concept of capital started to feature. Land and businesses were acquired by a section of the community, forcing the rest to labour for this elite. Entrepreneurs could borrow money to speed development of their ideas, but the lenders or “shareholders”, became the first in the queue to be rewarded from the wealth created. Pay them too little, and they would lend to others rather than you. Suppliers of labour were well down the list of beneficiaries from the growing economy. The lower the cost of labour, the quicker wealth could accumulate. Slavery, colonisation, mechanisation, automation, unemployment all kept labour costs low. Growing profit rather than just the payment of labour and some reinvestment costs became the aim. The availability of capital enabled companies to become juggernauts or monsters, which could gobble up other companies, in part to prevent they themselves from being gobbled up in turn. In this process, it is not just labour that is exploited but the planet too. Relentless growth is accompanied by mining, construction, destruction of nature and pollution. As Hickel says, “clean energy might help deal with emissions, but it does nothing to reverse deforestation, overfishing, soil depletion, and mass extinction. A growth-obsessed economy powered by clean energy will still tip us into ecological disaster”. “What is required is “degrowth” – a planned reduction of excess energy and resource use to bring the economy back into balance with the living world in a safe just and equitable way”. With the technology and scientific understanding that we now have, we can move to a degrowth society “while at the same time ending poverty, improving human wellbeing, and ensuring good lives for all”.We liberate people from the toil of unnecessary products, and shorten the working week to maintain full employment, and expand access to key public services like universal healthcare education and housing. To preserve the planet, nine potentially destabilising processes must be kept under control; climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean acidification, land-use change, nitrogen and phosphorous loading, freshwater use, atmospheric aerosol loading, chemical pollution and ozone depletion. A capitalist growth economy always wants to take more; more resources, more labour, more energy, producing “stuff “, we neither realise we want or need. Degrowth transitions our efforts into things that we do need, a cooler climate, more biodiversity, healthcare, social equality, and less disparity in income. Truly, “Less is More”. ... See MoreSee Less
Sustainability in Practice

2 years ago

Sustainability in Practice
Sustainability in Practice

2 years ago

Sustainability in Practice
Sustainability in Practice

3 years ago

Sustainability in Practice
Come to our discussion on insulation, draught-proofing, and zero carbon heating of traditional granite houses, to be held on Tuesday 3rd May, 7-9 pm, via Zoom. Go to Eventbrite, Aberdeen Climate Action events. ... See MoreSee Less
Sustainability in Practice

3 years ago

Sustainability in Practice
Clarification required regarding compostable plastics. Oil-based plastic films are not edible by micro-organisms, so when left as litter does not degrade. In contrast plastic plant-based films classified as compostable break down in contact with the soil, in what is a low temperature rotting process. These break down over 6-8 months in my garden composter. Materials classified as biodegradable need to be treated in an industrial composting process, with temperatures rising to 70°C. The result is a compost crumb structure, suitable for spreading on land as a fertiliser. They may or may not decompose at lower temperatures. Oxy, oil-based plastic materials, have a light sensitive chemical in them, which causes the film to break into small fragments of material, which will not subsequently degrade. For compostable or biodegradable films to break down, the microbes need a blended mix of protein, minerals, carbohydrates, air and moisture. Optimally films need to be shredded and mixed with food or garden waste to speed digestion by microbes. As compostable films become the norm for food packaging, more attention will have to be paid to ensure the compost caddy contains a waste mixture that suits micro-organisms’ digestive needs. If plant-based and oil-based films are not clearly differentiated, the default action must be to put the film in the residual waste bin. When we realise that plant-based films are not only plastic substitutes but are in fact food, we can start sending such material to anaerobic digesters to produce biogas to substitute for CO2 producing natural gas. ... See MoreSee Less
Copyright © 2025 Sustainability in Practice | Powered by Responsive Theme